An exclusive approach

IF CRIMES AGAINST NORTH-EAST PEOPLE ARE TO BE CHECKED THERE IS NEED FOR FAST-TRACK TRIALS AND STRINGENT PUNISHMENT. THIS WILL HELP CREATE SAFER ENVIRONMENT AND SECURITY  NOT ONLY FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE NORTH-EAST BUT ALSO ALL CITIZENS AND EVENTULLY HELP PROMOTE HARMONY AMONG  DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES, SAYS  NINGLUN HANGHAL


To ensure security and safety of people from the North-east in Delhi and other metros, early this month Union home minister Rajnath Singh said the government was considering the introduction of two new sections in the Indian Penal Code, Section 153 and Section 509. This comes after the government accepted the recommendations of the MP Bezbarua Committee that was formed in February last year in the aftermath of uproar over the death in January of Nido Tania, a teenaged student from Arunachal Pradesh.

Other recommendations being considered include an exchange programme, special police units and helplines, the inclusion of North-east history in the curriculum of schools and universities and recruitment of North-eastern youths into the police services.

The pros and cons of the proposed IPC amendments are being examined and, once finalised, a bill is likely to be introduced in Parliament.

While not much positive changes are expected, the measures are definitely not a new concept. It is worth recall that in May 2012 the MHA had issued an advisory to all state home departments, chief secretaries, DGs/IGs, Union ministry of social justice and empowerment, DoNER, National Commission for STs. The said advisory on discrimination and racial profiling faced by the North-eastern people in some parts of the country and the measures needed to curb the same stated that the duty and the responsibility lay with the state and its home departments to implement and monitor the advisory. It also underlined the role of the police as the first respondent and hence the need for immediate action by state governments and recommended sensitisation of police personnel and punishment of government employees found lacking in discharge of their duty. Besides, the MHA advisory laid out a strong measure — zero tolerance on crime against weaker sections, such as the North-east communities.

It had recommended other security measures and prevention such as social networking, helplines and an outreach programme with North-east communities. It also advised that Section 3 of the SC and ST (Prevention of atrocities) Act should be invoked if any of the victims were found to belong to the ST category.

Helplines 1091 and 1093 have been set up. Following the 2010 Dhaula Kuan gangrape rape case of a North-east woman BPO employee, the Delhi police had asked all BPOs in Delhi and the NCR to drop their women employees home safely and provide them security during the night. Meanwhile, mention of the North-east is also found in the text books of the National Council of Educational Research and Training. Moreover, several festivals were held to “showcase North-eastern culture and traditions” in the cities.

IPC Section 153, clause A and B says, “Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc, and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony — by words either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquillity”. IPC Section 509 mentions: word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman. Under the two said sections, the punishment is a jail term of five and one year, respectively.

Apparently, the move is cosmetic and appears to be one to counter a possible protest on the death anniversary of Nido Tania (30 January), what with Delhi elections round the corner.

It is a welfare approach, where issues and problems were considered from the viewpoint of “grievances” rather than a problem that need to be tackled in the larger issue of crime and violence. Moreover, the approach is “exclusivist” in the sense that the matter or issue is considered under special provisions as a “special case”, such as exclusive “helplines” or special units.

Rather than integrate or “mainstream”, such measures would further exclude and alienate people from the North-east in the mainland. No doubt, being a minority in “mainland” India they are vulnerable to discriminations and assaults, further aggravated by the indifference of the “mainlanders”. Yet, as far as violence is concerned, which is the basic problem here, the most important thing to be noted is that “crime” should not be dealt with only from the “victim’s” perspective but also from the angle of those who commit crimes and the locations, and why and how such crimes happened in a particular area. It is also important to underline that the North-east populations in metros are not or should not only be considered the “beneficiaries” or stakeholders of such security or safety measures or such “goodwill acts” but also the locals themselves (the mainlanders) and society at large.

Another much-talked about important issue is “misunderstandings” of cultural difference and the need for interactions and awareness initiatives. Therefore, any issue should not be tackled from one direction alone but considerations and involvement of both communities should come into play so as to bridge the gap and facilitate a cordial relationship and mutual coexistence.

There are enough laws in India, the loopholes lie in their implementation. It is also a fact that many cases disappear in the long-drawn judicial process. Many accused have been acquitted or given bail. If crimes are to be tackled, there is need for stringent punishment and fast-track trials. This will create a safer environment and security not only for North-easterners but also for all citizens and eventually help promote harmony among different communities.

The Statesman ( NE page) 
January 12,2015
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Collateral Damage ?

Haolenphai village in Chandel district, Manipur is once again in the news. The village is about 5 kilometres from Moreh town, an important Indo-Myanmar border trade centre.
Earlier, tension had been shimmering in this border village after Myanmar Army tried to open camps in their village, claiming the area lies within their country. According to the villagers the neighbouring country’s troops were frequently patrolling the area and have even asked the inhabitants of Haolenphai to leave the “encroach area”.Moreover, it was reported that the Army personnel were in the process of shifting the Myanmar border pillars into Indian territory in  Haolenphai and adjoining villages.Villagers also alleged that Myanmarese farmers were felling large number of tress in area for Jhum (shifting) cultivation.
 Following this developments, last year the Centre government halted the controversial India-Myanmar border fencing exercise which had been taken up along the Moreh sector by Border Roads Organization (BRO).
Now, Hoalenphai dwellers are yet again faced with another challenge of losing their village land, as the new government pushes its way forward in taking up development ventures.
Stiff opposition came from the village chief , the Thadou Student  Association (TSA)  and other civil bodies against the setting of  a 3,000-acre smart city in this border area in and around Haolenphai village.  Several forms of agitation have been taken out such as blockade of national highway, bandhs and Peaceful demonstrations were taken out in several art of Manipur including in New Delhi.
The said border area have also been earmarked for setting up of “New Commercial Town ship” The master plan 2012 – 2032 is undertaken by Town and Country Planning Organization, MoUD , GoI and Manipur government.   
Though the proposed smart city is yet to take its form, media reports in Manipur had quoted the state Industry Minister Govindas Konthoujam as saying that the required 3000 acres of land had been acquired for the smart city. 
This led to a stir with village chief and villagers coming out in defence of their rights and law of the land. A village of about 100 households,  Haolenphai is inhabitanted by the Thadou – Kuki tribals who were dependent on agriculture and natural resources from the surrounding forest produce. 
In fact, if land acquisition take place, these villages will be physically bulldozed and the dwellers be displaced , not only from the land but from their basic livelihood. Further, for indegineous tribals , land is not only an emotive issue but a political one too.
According to the Thadou Student Association the proposed plan for smart city nor the said land acquisition, if any, was not in the knowledge of the village Chief. The move against the consent of Tribal Chief is a disrespect and suppression of the right of the indigenous tribals which is also against the very basis of democracy.
The TSA’s memorandum submitted to the State Chief Minister and Prime Minister demanded to revoke the said land acquisition.
"Concept note on Smart Cities" was unvield in September by Urban Minister Venkaiah Naidu. According to the Ministry , the important feature of the smart city is access to information, such as city datas, information related to various service providers , transports and information for potential investors, through multiple channels – internet , mobile, apps, radio Tv etc.

Setting up 100 Smart City in several regional locations across the country is a concept of taking urban middle class living into a new level , where 24/7 utilities services with technology-based governance and monitoring of services to be provided to citizens.  Earlier during the Budget session Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had promised an allocation of Rs 7,060 crore.    

Meanwhile the new Government is keen on pushing pending development projects in North East India. The Minister for DoNER, has assured for time bound completion of major infrastructure projects of Rail, Road, Telecom, Inland Water Transport, Airports and Power in the North Eastern Region.   
As gateway to South East Asian countries , the North East region’s  economic and strategic advantages hold a important role and is the key to advancing regional influence. Look East policy have also been re-termed “Act East Policy“ recently by Prime Minister Modi in his addressed  at the East Asia Summit at Nay Pyi Daw in Myanmar. Government of India has also taken steps for the development of road and port projects in Myanmar, improvement of customs facilities at the Indo-Myanmar border, development of road and rail connectivity in Bangladesh for access to sea ports and appropriate customs facilities at the Indo-Bangladesh border.
But for people living in the periphery, this creates fear and insecurity. The slogans say it all. Thadou Students who held a demonstration recently in Delhi called to “ save Hoalenphai village” “ save our tribals lands”.

Asserting that tribals in the hills have their own system of land holding based on customary and traditional practice, the student demonstrators alleged that their rights have been systematically violated and that the proposed project is an attempt to grab the tribal lands. 

For people in the village their utmost need are basic amenities and facilities such as hospitals and better education. Opposition to projects that are not viable for people is not anti-development per se , said Thangpimang Kipgen one of the Student leader.  According to him ,in the present situation and context , where Villagers were  dependent on the forest land and forest produce their livelihood would be wiped out. The main concern , the student leader stated is that villagers  do not have the required skills and knowledge to take advantage of such “smart cities” and therefore the benefit of such development will automatically go to “non- inhabitants/villagers” and that none of the villagers will make it to the new city. Another concern being , that  displacement will further led to being wiped out completely as a community, thus their very core existence is at stake. Demonstrators also cautioned that the said proposed lands are areas of thick forest lands. Destruction of the forest lands will pose grave threats to the eco diversity and environment. 

Will the poor tribal villagers be considered a mere collateral damage in the process of development and progress is something that needs a serious re-thinking. While displacement of 100 household may be ‘insignificant’ in the larger concept and vision of development and economic advancement , it may also be noted that huge investment as far as north east is concern have not yield any desired output, let alone profit. Mega dams in the region are such examples where mega projects stands as mere physical infrastructure. 

NE SUN 
November 2014 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------